This is wrong. What the Bible actually says is “Judge correctly.”
This is wrong. What the Bible actually says is “Judge correctly.”
I love my Catechism and include it in my daily Bible and prayer time. It is full of information and is often quite beautiful in the spiritual truths it expresses.
It is also copiously footnoted. Recently, I became interested to learn just how many pages had Bible footnotes. I finished the count today.
Read it for yourself. Catechism of the Catholic Church is available in print for a small fee or on-line for free:
Have you ever noticed how the ONLY evidence anyone can cite for the alleged hostility of the Catholic Church to science is the Galileo affair? The RCC has been around for nearly 2,000 years. You’d think if its hostility to science was such a big deal, there’s be more evidence, wouldn’t you?
The fact is that, while the Galileo thing was not a shining moment in my church’s history, it was also not the one-sided affair most people seem to think it was. Galileo himself bears a great deal of the blame. And he was never tortured or thrown into prison either. His punishment for flipping the bird at the pope was house arrest in a country house near Florence. He died peacefully in his own bed. Poor baby.
In fact, until he gave up pure science and became obsessed with converting public opinion and trying to force the Roman Catholic hierarchy to espouse his theological ideas, Galileo was celebrated by leaders of the RCC, including the pope. If he’d stuck with science and left theology to the theologians, he would never have gotten into trouble.
But no … he had to become his century’s version of Al Gore (not that Al Gore was ever in his life an actual scientist). And, given how brutally hostile the scientific community is today toward so-called climate deniers and those who espouse Intelligent Design, I’m thinking the RCC in Galileo’s day had NOTHING on today’s secular scientists.
Plus, it’s not like Galileo was right about everything. He believed, for example, that comets were exhalations of the atmosphere and tides were caused by the rotation of the Earth. Ahem. He also never dropped anything off the Tower of Pisa.
Pope (now Saint) John Paul II felt that the conflict between Galileo and the RCC ought never to have occurred, because faith and science, properly understood, can never be at odds. It’s in the Catechism:
The Galileo Affair <- Good article on the topic
How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
The Galileo Affair is covered on pages 67-74.
Galileo’s Leaning Tower of Pisa Experiment <- Never happened
The 35 Lunar Craters Named For Jesuits
Catholic Catechism: Faith and Science
If you google “The Twelve Days of Christmas”, you’ll get lots of hits for the tale of the “Secret Catechism” allegedly used by persecuted Catholics living in England after Henry VIII broke with Rome.
As quaint as the idea may be, it doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
Apart from the lack of historical evidence, the tale of the “Secret Catechism” doesn’t even make much sense internally.
If the song had ever been a true mnemonic, the various items would have more consistent meanings. But I found “two turtledoves” listed in some places as either the two natures in Jesus (human and divine) or as the Old and New Testaments. “Three French hens” is variously assigned to the Trinity, the Three Theological Virtues (Faith, Hope, Charity), or the three gifts of the Wise Men.
Also, if it had been invented as a memory aid, the gifts would bear some relation to the things they supposedly represent. This is notably lacking in the “Secret Catechism” legend. I mean … what do “lords a’leaping” have to do with the stern “Thou Shalt Not” Ten Commandments? Huh?
Some of the items aren’t even accurate. For example, “eight maids a’milking” is supposedly a reference to the eight Beatitudes … except there are nine Beatitudes. See Matthew 5:3-10 and the Catholic Catechism paragraph 1716.
“Four calling birds” is a mistranslation of original “colly [black as coal] birds.” In Judaeo-Christian symbolism, blackbirds and ravens represent temptation, sin, and the devil, but the “Secret Catechism” supposedly used them to represent the four Gospels. I. Don’t. Think. So.
Finally, “a partridge in a pear tree” is supposed to represent Jesus Christ on the cross, because “a mother partridge feigns injury to decoy predators from her helpless nestlings.” Except … this is not true. Some species of birds do engage in this “distraction display” behavior … but partridges are not among them.
The fact is … “The Twelve Days of Christmas” is just a traditional counting song whose only saving grace is that it’s not as long or as annoying as “99 Bottles of Beer.”
Jesus did not say we should be doormats for every bully that comes along.
When He said, “Turn the other cheek”, he was using a common rabbinical teaching tool known as ‘hyperbole’ in order to accentuate an important point. Other examples of hyperbole from the Sermon on the Mount include:
To correctly interpret Jesus’ words, we must consider everything we know about what He said and did. Consider John 18:22-23 for example, where Jesus does not meekly turn the other cheek when someone smacks Him.
One of the temple guards standing there struck Jesus and said, “Is this the way you answer the high priest?” Jesus answered him, “If I have spoken wrongly, testify to the wrong; but if I have spoken rightly, why do you strike me?”
And far from condemning military service, Jesus praised the faith of the Roman centurion (Matt 8:8ff) and told the apostles to “take up a sword” for self-defense (Luke 22:36-38).
To correctly interpret Jesus’ words, we also need to ensure we have them translated properly.
Ecclesiastes 3:1,3,7,8 says,“There is an appointed time for everything, and a time for every affair under the heavens. A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to tear down, and a time to build. A time to be silent, and a time to speak. A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.”
Jesus whipped the money changers, then rebuked Peter for using violence to try and stop His arrest. He talked back to the temple guard, then quietly submitted to His undeserved torture and death. Given such conflicting examples, the only way we can be sure we are making good choices in our daily lives is to be in constant communication with the One who knows everything.
In everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, make your requests known to God. Then the peace of God that surpasses all understanding will guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus. – Phil 4:6-7
Planned Parenthood execs and pro-abortion Democrats like Nancy Pelosi claim that attempts to defund Planned Parenthood represent a “Republican war on women.”
Pelosi went so far as to state that “Planned Parenthood clinics are often one of the few affordable health care options for many women.” This isn’t even remotely true.
There are only 665 Planned Parenthood clinics in the United States. These clinics provide abortions, plus some limited health care to women. None of them does mammograms and only a handful offer prenatal care.
By contrast, there are 13,500 non-PP clinics in the United States that provide comprehensive health care to women without doing abortions.
There are only two kinds of women who will be hurt if we stop giving tax dollars to Planned Parenthood: Planned Parenthood executives and Democrat politicians. Since both of these groups is in the six-figures-a-year income group, I couldn’t care less.
One: They do not … repeat NOT … do mammograms. At all. Anywhere.
Two: Abortion is not … repeat NOT … “just 3%” of what they do.
Ninety-four out of every 100 unborn babies that enter a Planned Parenthood clinic are put to death.
This figure may even be higher, given that a single pregnant woman may have gotten both prenatal care and an adoption referral, because really … what is an “adoption referral” anyway? A pamphlet listing local adoption agencies?
And how were the “Prenatal Services” counted? Most women have between ten and 15 prenatal visits per pregnancy. If Planned Parenthood’s annual report counted each prenatal visit as a single service, then the number of pregnant women for whom they provided prenatal care drops from an apparent 18+ thousand to around one-tenth that number. And gosh, what a surprise, that happens to be just about the same number who got handed a pamphlet about local adoption agencies.
So … if, in fact, all of the prenatal and adoption referrals listed in the annual report represent fewer than 2,000 actual pregnant women, then the chances an unborn baby will go to Planned Parenthood to die jumps to 99%.
Even adding in all the other things Planned Parenthood does will not get you to the “abortion is only 3%” lie. PP engineered that figure to obscure how committed they are to killing babies; they perform 30% of all abortions in this country. Here’s how they “lied with statistics” to get their “just 3%” figure.
Let’s consider a single patient in a single year. She comes in one time for her annual and gets a vaginal exam, a breast exam, a pregnancy test, an STD test, and a pap smear. This isn’t counted as a single service (annual exam), but 5 services. If her pregnancy test was positive and she came back for an abortion and went home with a pain prescription, that counted as two more services. If she then dropped by once a month to pick up her monthly birth control pill prescription, that counted as twelve more services. All told, this single client was actually seen by a health practitioner only two times in that year and one of those times was to kill her unborn child. Yet by Planned Parenthood’s reckoning, only 5% of the “services” she received that year was for an abortion.
Only an organization trying to HIDE WHAT THEY DO would count like this!
Plus, how is it some kind of virtue that they “only” kill babies some of the time? John Edwards only had one child with his mistress while his wife was dying of cancer and Timothy McVeigh only blew up that one building that one time. Sheesh.
Reading their annual report shows you how committed they are to abortion. On page FIVE, they blat about their efforts to “reduce the stigma of abortion in popular culture.”
Read more @ Planned Parenthood’s Pathetic Three Percent Lie by Rich Lowry – August 3, 2015
It is not true that the Vatican is awash in cash and thus hypocritical for criticizing materialism, unbridled capitalism, and excessive wealth.
Note: When Catholic teaching refers to capitalism, it is NOT referring to the heavily regulated capitalism we have here in the United States. Pope John Paul II defined “unbridled capitalism” as “a system in which freedom in the economic sector is not circumscribed within a strong juridical framework which places it at the service of human freedom in its totality.” Centesimus Annus (full text linked below).
You could put a dollar value on my small, country parish’s church home, but what would that prove? We built it ourselves, raised the money to pay off the mortgages, continue to contribute with money, time and labor to maintain it, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, we use it every day. It is just one of more than 17,000 in the U.S. alone. So yeah … if you added up all the dollar values for these properties, it would make a great big number with lots of zeroes. But so what? On paper, my house is worth a lot too … BUT I LIVE IN IT.
The Vatican City State is “rich” if you put dollar values on the priceless art. But you can’t sell the buildings, any more than you could sell the White House or the Coliseum. And they do require upkeep. Some years ago, the Church paid for a multi-million dollar restoration of the Michaelangelo masterpiece on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. The Vatican itself occasionally has a lean year when its overall budget runs in the red, but most of the cost of upkeep for the buildings and art treasures is covered by entrance fees paid by the tourists who come to enjoy the history and beauty every year.
Catholicism teaches us to use what we have to sustain our families and seek the good of society with what is left. The institutional Catholic Church “family” runs more charities and hospitals than any other entity on the planet and often contributes to nations that have suffered disasters. While there have been isolated cases of financial abuse, they are not common and would appear quite paltry next to the shenanigans of the Clinton Foundation. Also, the current pope lives in what amounts to a dorm room and recently raffled off a dozen or so items he’d been given, including a car. The proceeds were given to charity.