Let’s not insult women by calling that shameful nonsense a “Women’s March”

By Matt Walsh.

On Saturday, thousands of ladies in vagina hats descended upon DC to demand more dead babies.

They demanded other things, too, like free birth control and free tampons and a free Palestine. They demanded equal rights, even though they already have equal rights. They demanded that the wage gap be closed, even though the wage gap is a fabrication. And they demanded that the government “get out of their uterus,” even though the government was never — and, really, for logistical reasons never could be — in their uterus.

32460766305_b9691bf2d1_z-554x413

The march was an eclectic mix of non sequiturs and falsehoods. Every aspect of feminist mythology was represented in one way or another. But unlimited access to abortion was the theme that tied it all together. Before the march even began, abortion on demand had been proclaimed an essential “unity principle” of the so-called “Women’s March.” They were so serious about this principle that pro-life groups were barred from participating. It’s fair to say that once a political demonstration cites baby murder as a fundamental value, nothing else it stands for really matters. I cannot take a march seriously after it has professed an affinity for child killing just as I cannot willingly consume your homemade chocolate cake after you inform me that fecal matter is one of its ingredients.

32072001620_648292db09_z-554x414

But I’m not sure that I could have taken the march seriously even if continuing the mass slaughter of children hadn’t been named as one of its fundamental goals. It’s hard to take people seriously when they’re all wearing genitalia-themed beanies, after all. It’s even more difficult when they’ve adorned themselves in vagina masks, and full vagina costumes, and are carrying vagina signs, including some grossly explicit and some casually sacrilegious. But please don’t think that it was only a bunch of vaginas walking around. Penises were sometimes represented in the signage and the outfits as well, though usually with a derisive tone. Feminists, as you’ve noticed, are rather obsessed with genitals. That’s why they can’t get together for any kind of event without half of them showing up dressed as their own reproductive organs.

[continue reading here]

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Feminism, Matt Walsh

4 responses to “Let’s not insult women by calling that shameful nonsense a “Women’s March”

  1. chrissythehyphenated

    “The March For Life has never featured so many (or any) participants wearing vagina hats, nor have any of their speakers ever threatened to blow up the White House or accused the president of wanting to rape his daughter.”

    It remains to be seen if the media that slobbered over the Women’s March will even show up at today’s March for Life, much less cover it fairly. I’m not holding my breath.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. chrissythehyphenated

    “I am quite confident that the “Women’s March” was nowhere close to an accurate representation of most women. It didn’t deserve to call itself a “Women’s March” because those people were not marching in support of anything so universal as “Women.” Abortion, free birth control, a subsidized sex life — these are not the demands of mature, adult ladies. Selfishness, brutality, vulgarity, dishonesty — these are not feminine qualities. Women can certainly possess those qualities just like men, but they do so at the expense of their femininity.”

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: The Weekly Headlines – My Daily Musing

  4. Pingback: The Weekly Headlines by lafayetteangel – Br Andrew's Muses