Donna Brazile: Zero Credibility

“Donna Brazile has a big problem with Russia’s alleged interference in our recent election. Which in itself is not all that remarkable, as the allegations are unsettling, to say the least.” – Twitchy

2016_12-12-brazile-tweet

“But for Brazile to suggest that she has any moral standing on something like this is … well, it’s pretty ridiculous.” – Twitchy

2016_12-12-response-to-brazile

In October 2016, leaked emails proved that Democratic National Committee boss and now-former CNN contributor Donna Brazile had sent debate questions to the Clinton campaign in advance of the debate, so that Hillary Clinton could be better prepared than Donald Trump was.

The controversy cost Brazile her position with CNN, but she is apparently still the chair of the DNC.  She assumed the post in July 24, 2016, when the DNC announced Debbie Wasserman Schultz had to vacate it following revelations by WikiLeaks of multiple alleged indiscretions by Wasserman Schultz concerning candidate Bernie Sanders.

Soooooo … screwing with the election on behalf of Bernie got Debbie canned as DNC chair, but screwing with the election on behalf of Hillary had no effect on Brazile’s butt sitting in said chair.  Interesting.

Sources:

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Democrats, Donna Brazile, Hillary Clinton, Russia

5 responses to “Donna Brazile: Zero Credibility

  1. jbob45

    Donna’s big claim to fame was preparing cribsheets for Hillary during the debate, nearly 2 months ago. Something that far back in time qualifies as ancient history, and for an attention-deficit disordered electorate, just as quickly forgotten.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. A foreign power interfering in our elections…

    Does George Soros count?

    Hillary Clinton’s top money man

    Liked by 1 person

  3. FranklytheNut

    You mean the way President Obama got caught with by a live mike sending a message to “Vladimir” about having “more flexibility” after the 2012 election to deal with contentious issues like missile defense, so they needed to “give (him) some space” until the election was over? And all the Democrats complained about him colluding with the Russians? Or when Teddy Kennedy, in 1984, sent a message to Yuri Andropov that if Russia would help the Democrats with the upcoming election, Kennedy would help keep Reagan under control in his dealings with Russia? And all the Democrats hated THAT, too.

    Liked by 2 people