When Debbie got back to Rand

Reporter: “Would you support any exceptions to a ban on abortions?”

Rand Paul: “In general, I am pro-life. So I will support legislation that advances and shows that life is special and deserves protection.”

Reporter: “Should there be any exemptions or not?”

Rand Paul: “Why don’t we ask the DNC: Is it okay to kill a seven-pound baby in the uterus? You go back and you ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a seven-pound baby that is not born yet. Ask her when life begins, and you ask Debbie when it’s okay to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, get back to me.”

Debbie tweeted her response: “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”

Rand tweeted too: “It sounds like her answer is yes, that she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby.”

Fetus pondering Democrat position on life

When FACEPALM is not enough

A majority of Americans support restrictions on abortion that are favored by Republican candidates,

  • such as requiring health inspections and hospital privileges for out-patient abortion clinics,
  • such as requiring waiting periods, ultrasounds and parental notification for abortions on minors;
  • such as banning abortion after 20 weeks gestation because fetuses not only feel pain, but experience it more intensely than we do, because they have not yet developed the ability to filter out stimuli.

It’s an undeniable fact that late-term abortions are barbaric procedures that make water-boarding and capital punishment pale in comparison, but ask Debbie Democrat to discuss the issue honestly and what does she do?

She plays the “You’re a meanie pants MAN” card.

Specifically, she told Rand, “I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me.”

But how did he “shush” her?

All he did was ask her legitimate questions that she didn’t want to answer honestly. Most people call that kind of thing “having a mature discussion.”  But you know Democrats; treat one of THEIR females as a true equal in the rough-and-tumble game of national politics and they hit the fainting couch.

“Oh noes! He gave me the back of his hand! He tried to shush me! Get me the smelling salts!”

It’s pathetic.

2015_04 08 Children are never a mistake

April 8, 2015 Pope Francis: No child is a mistake!

Sources:

6 Comments

Filed under Abortion, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Democrats, Pope Francis, Rand Paul

6 responses to “When Debbie got back to Rand

  1. chrissythehyphenated

    Like

  2. chrissythehyphenated

    Bob Owens tweets: Clearly, @DWStweets is pro-infanticide to the point of irrationality. Does anyone find this surprising?

    Sean Davis tweets: “Without government getting involved.” Except for subsidies. @DWStweets loves herself some government subsidies for abortionists.

    Stephen Miller tweets: Hi @DWStweets What’s the difference between what Democrats believe & what convicted serial killer Kermit Gosnell believes. I’ll wait.

    Like

  3. “The other is a figure from Greek mythology.” Hilarious! 🙂

    Like

    • chrissythehyphenated

      Can’t take credit for the line … saw it at Twitchy! It was so good, I had to make a graphic!

      Like

  4. Progressives think the government needs to be involved in every aspect of our lives, because we’re too stupid to decide for ourselves what foods we should eat and what vaccinations we should have and what kind of insurance we should buy and on and on and on…. but when it comes to a mother killing her baby, they suddenly turn into flaming libertarians.

    Like

    • Well said. Once your kid is born, they want to tell you everything about how you’re required to raise it. And no effort is too much “if it only saves one life.” But this sack of shredded baby parts? Hands off you meddler!

      Like