Daily Archives: January 15, 2015

Not a news story

Q. How is Ted Cruz having a beer 28 years ago a news story?  
A. When it’s the best the Left Stream Media can come up with to diss a popular conservative leader.

2015_01 14 Cruz story Yawn

Other crimes cited by tweeters:

  • Saying “under God” while reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
  • Waving the American Flag! Yes, he does that!
  • Sounding more presidential than the president.
  • Speaking without a TelePrompter.
  • Being a minority off the Democrat plantation.
  • Living rent-free in the heads of Progs.

The “Oh wait” list:

  • Left Americans to die oversees for political gaming…lied…got amnesia … Oh wait, that was Hillary Clinton.
  • Bought guns for Mexican cartel with Taxpayer money then lied when caught … Oh wait, that was Eric Holder.
  • Pleaded guilty to wire and mail fraud and misuse of campaign funds … Oh wait, that was Jesse Jackson, Jr.

2015_01 14 Cruz story BHO toking

2015_01 14 Cruz Story Two Teds

Sources:

2 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Media Bias, Ted Cruz, Ted Kennedy

Great men don’t do this

2015_01 15 BHO does another pic of himself

Comments Off on Great men don’t do this

Filed under Barack Obama

SOME THOUGHTS ON ISLAM

It seems that everyone on the left, from the Mullah-In Chief to the lickspittles in the media who carry his water like a perverse army of Gunga Dins, fall all over themselves to avoid calling these murderous Muslim  scum out for what they really are. Is it because they share an anti-semitic hatred of Judiasm at their core? Are they afraid if they show the new cover of Charlie Hebdo on air a bunch of towel-headed sandal-footed swarthy Mediteranean types smelling strongly of sheep will blow them up?

I heard a clip on redeye radio this AM from some hack on MSDNC that claimed the radical Muzzies make up.0001 of the population. Fact:15-25% are actively Jihadists. The other 75-85% of Muslims,they claim are peaceful. But at least 40% of them approve of killing infidels because their religion calls for it. Remember in 1930’s Germany about 20% belonged to the Nazi Party. The rest were peaceful. How’d that end up working out?

Even though I haven’t been posting every day,I’ve been keeping up with things.

Were you aware:

Jews make up about 1% of the population in France but are victims of 40% of crime?

Muslims are about 10% of the people but account for 60% of those incarcerated?

Muslims have been killing Christians and Jews for centuries,but it seems to me they’ve gotten bolder since one of their brotherhood threw away everything we sacrificed for in Iraq and Afghanistan.His cowardice and treachery has caused much blood to be spilled needlessly.

370x555xunnamed-111_jpg_pagespeed_ic_Okg-xg51NG

2015-01-13

10458214_884207021625538_8762363259677176059_n

submit

thats_retarded
tumblr_inline_nhvrcdIeZI1rwqnru

10489689_727823817263860_7218576318642269143_n

10906505_709136515875405_3703301746412293883_n

10898000_950386921688104_1195914483993305782_n

1527074_10203401849826922_7941606406381342980_n

 

23 Comments

Filed under Islam, Terrorism

Democrats stomp their constitutionally illiterate feet

2015_01 12 Petition to remove Cruz

The White House “Make A Petition” thing is real, as is this particular petition demanding that President Obama remove Ted Cruz from his new appointment as Chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Science and Space.

Sadly for the poorly educated framers and signers of this petition, the President of the U.S. has exactly zero authority in this matter. Since each party assigns its own members to the various committees and each committee then distributes the assigned members among the subcommittees, Obama could have some influence on the assignment of Democrats. But Senator Cruz is a Republican.

As to the claim that Cruz is unqualified for the position due to being “scientifically illiterate” (which is Democrat code for “he doesn’t believe climate change is a threat to humanity”), it doesn’t make all that much difference here. The Senate Subcommittee on Science and Space only makes recommendations, which must then be approved by the entire Commerce Committee before being reported to the Senate, which must then vote on them.

Methinks the REAL function of this ridiculous petition is for the DNC to harvest names and contact info of potential donors. Me-also-thinks it’s highly unlikely to net them any new names, a situation about which I shall now weep great big scientific crocodile tears.

Sources:

2 Comments

Filed under Democrats, Republicans, Ted Cruz, U.S. Senate

Hillary should NEVER be POTUS

2015_01 15 Hillary has no comment

She hasn’t had diddly to say about Paris, but just last month, she was telling us how she thinks that “smart power” means to “empathize” and show “respect” for enemies.

Former Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North called her irrational and said, “If you’re going to run for president of the United States, you cannot talk that way about the people who intend to kill us. Who are dying to kill us. … This is capitulation.”

Sources:

2 Comments

Filed under Hillary Clinton

Two Americas

Democrats - Promise and Reality

Two Americas By Bob Lonsberry – Dec 9, 2013
http://www.lonsberry.com/writings.cfm?story=3651&go=4

The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.

The America that works, and the America that doesn’t. The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t.

It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, to obey the law and support themselves and contribute to society, and others don’t.

That’s the divide in America.

It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country.

That’s not invective, that’s truth.

And it’s about time someone said it.

The politics of envy was on proud display last week as the president said he would pledge the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He notes that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.

It was the rationale of thievery.

The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you.

Vote Democrat.

It is the electoral philosophy that gave us Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.

And it conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense. It ends up not being a benefit to the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them – in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope.

The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to ignore and cheat the law of choices and consequences. It seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.

Because, by and large, the variability in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure.

And success and failure can manifest themselves in personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them in wedlock and life is apt to take another course.

Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take.

My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome. But, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. Whereas my doctor went to college and then gave the flower of his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice. And our choices led us to different outcomes.

His outcome pays a lot better than mine.

Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?

No, it means we are both free men.

And in a free society, free choices will lead to different outcomes.

It is not inequality Barack Obama will take away, it is freedom.

The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. And there is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.

The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy.

Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing.

Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions.

Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get.”

The progressive movement would turn that upside down.

Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement has replaced effort as the key to upward mobility in American society.

Or at least it has if Barack Obama gets his way.

He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive and fosters equality through mediocrity.

He and his party speak of two Americas.

And their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other.

America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. And by the false philosophy that says one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.

What the president offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, he pitted one set of Americans against another.

For his own political benefit.

That’s what progressives offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.

Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.

(Note: This has been circulating in emails as having been written by former football coach and current ESPN college football analyst Lou Holtz. The URL above is the original 2013 publication by radio talk show host, columnist, author and conservative political commentator Bob Lonsberry.)

Comments Off on Two Americas

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Equality, Liberty

Mascot cuteness :)

2015_01 14  Alessia uses key to unlock van door

Comments Off on Mascot cuteness :)

Filed under Little Sprouts