Daily Archives: December 27, 2013

Eugenics and Nationalized Healthcare

The video linked below is an excerpt from the documentary “Architecture of Doom.”

It shows how the Nazis used nationalized health care (Hitlercare) to carry out an aggressive eugenics program of sterilization and euthanasia. Jews, Poles, Gypsies, the disabled, the retarded and the mentally ill were all defined as “infections” that had to be eradicated in order to bring about Utopia.

Eugenics was spawned by Darwin’s “Origin of Species.” Progressives (like Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood) were major promoters of human perfection via eugenics in the 1930’s. About 60,000 “defective” Americans were sterilized by eugenics programs in the United States alone.

One of Sanger’s dearest wishes was to use birth control and abortion to completely eliminate the Negro population from America. Her legacy, Planned Parenthood, is largely responsible for the below-replacement birth rate of American Blacks.

A top priority for ObamaCare has been free birth control, sterilization and abortion on demand. ObamaCare was 100% the product of far Left Democrats. These are the same people who booed God at the Democrat National Convention.

Are we seeing the pattern of atheism, nationalized healthcare and legalized murder here?

How Hitler used Universal Healthcare in Holocaust [33:09]

1 Comment

Filed under Abortion, Eugenics, Euthanasia, Margaret Sanger, Obamacare, Planned Parenthood, Race Relations

Is the “real news” being scripted by some central “authority”?

Feb 2013: Media scripting: The gas prices are back on the rise edition [1:22]

Dec 2013: Media scripting: The one or two or ten edition [2:36]

Right at the end of both videos, Conan talks about how this is more than a little scary. Ya think?

Former news reporter Ben Swann points out:

“In most of these cases … the source of that script is some kind of wire service. … A station reporter or producer will copy and paste it word for word into a newscast. The problem with this policy is that reporters and producers simply take that content as gospel and no one in any newsroom ever bothers to fact check or verify if the wire story is correct.”

The local reporters and producers are also not making any independent decisions about WHAT STORIES MATTER.

The news that people think/talk about is largely based on what they see on the broadcast MSM news. WHAT people think about these issues is framed almost entirely by the amount of TIME devoted to a particularly story and the TONE the story takes.

At ABC, CBS, NBC and their affiliates, these decisions about TIME and TONE are being made by a handful of wire services, most of which have easily demonstrated ties to the Democrat Party and bias toward the Leftist agenda.

Source:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/definitive-proof-mainstream-media-scripted-is/

3 Comments

Filed under Media Bias

How vindictive are they really?

According to a post at the National Liberty Foundation, President Barack Obama himself may have instigated the attempt to crush the Duck Dynasty show during an off-the-record meeting with high profile liberal journalists in late November during which he suggested they could do to the Robertsons what they had done to Paula Deen.

Deen slams MOOCH, Deen loses tv spot

I have NO idea if the alleged “Barack sics MSM on Phil” thing is legit. For all I know, the story started at the Onion or some other satire site.

What I find troubling is that it is SO VERY EASY FOR ME TO BELIEVE that our President and First Lady would not just deliberately target the reputations and livelihoods of individual Americans for failing to toe the Leftie Line, but that it wouldn’t bother their stone-dead consciences in the least to do so.

Do you get what I’m saying here? Whether they actually did it to Paula and/or Phil is almost BESIDE THE POINT.  They have shown themselves to be the kind of people who would and could. And they live in the White House.

Sources:

3 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Phil Robertson

PETE’S PAGE; CHRISTMAS AFTERGLOW EDITION

Posted by Pistol Pete

Hope everybody had a  wonderful and blessed Christmas. Ours was excellent,though I must confess I’m glad its over for another year. As usual,DW put on an awesome meal and the little ones had fun sledding on the big hill behind our house. I watched them through the sliders and tried to remember when I had that much energy.

Just had to post a few things to keep in shape.

This is our oldest granddaughter,Jessica. She’s 18 and turned into quite a lady. Whenever the family gets together Miss Olivia attatches herself to Jess like a lamprey eel on a shark. Olivia is a bigger ham than the one we enjoyed for dinner.

DSCN2784

This is DW with the electric scent machine she got.

DSCN2783

My favorite gift…a cup with a picture of my little ones that says:love you papa. I’ll treasure this long after they’ve grown up.

DSCN2774

15_dolar_minimum_wage_idiocy

1468701_258699630953672_2054905264_n-500x383

1535662_498916833557849_1792589204_n-500x660

democrats_suck_dynasty

dick_dynasty_bill_clinton_anthony_weiner_eliot_spitzer_bob_filner

michelle_obama_helle_thorning_schmidt_friday_the_13th

oshoes_bo2

Screen-shot-2013-12-23-at-1_27_28-PM

52 Comments

Filed under Funny Stuff, Holidays

ZeroCAre

Folks are reporting that the Covered California health exchange websites does not work very well. Or at all. Websites are hard.

2013_12 23 OBAMACARE Websites are hard

One person managed to get into the Help section. Spelling is also hard.

2013_12 23 OBAMACARE Spelling is hard

One person managed to get almost all the way to the end before being told the web page for finishing was not available. But at least they spelled “available” correctly.

2013_12 23 OBAMACARE Web page not available

Recalling how Barack, Michelle and Pajamaboy all urged us to “make it a Christmas treat around the table to talk about a little health care” [gag me], Michelle Malkin rightly noted, “There sure is an awful lot of arm-twisting required to sell a law that was supposed to be the best thing ever.”  Malkin noted that she did her duty to POTUS and FLOTUS. “I did bring up the subject of Obamacare at my house on Thanksgiving, but it was while we were stuffing the turkey, so it seemed metaphorically appropriate.” ROFL

Twitchy aggregated Christmas “we talked about Obamacare” tweets. Here are my faves:

  • We discussed Obamacare at the family Christmas party (90%libs). Everyone hates it. It was awesome. #notkidding
  • Talked about #Obamacare with family on Christmas. It still sucks…
  • I have been to 3 Christmas dinners and everyone agreed. It’s horrific and UNAMERICAN #truth
  • Took @barackobama’s advice and discussed #Obamacare over dinner. We’d like it repealed.
  • We talked about ObamaCare last night. For about 3 minutes. Then we all laughed.
  • We took about 2 seconds to agree Obamacare sucks. My family is awesome.
  • Noone spoke for Obamacare at Christmas party. Even Democrats were talking bad about it.

Sources:

1 Comment

Filed under Michelle Malkin, Obamacare

BINGO is never a BINGO

SCRABBLE SIT pillows

BINGO is a slang term used in Scrabble for a play using all seven of one’s tiles.

A player who does this receives 50 points in addition to what the word would normally score.

Since “bingo” only has 5 letters, it can never be a BINGO.

However, it is a legal word … unlike NONGO.

NONGO is a slang term used in SCRABBLE for a BINGO you have on your rack that you can’t find a place to play on the board.

“Nongo” is not a legal word, so even if you have it on your rack and can find a place to play it, it’s just TDB.

TDB is also not a legal word.

6 Comments

Filed under Scrabble

Un-ducking-believable

In an article about how Phil Robertson isn’t going to go on any apology tour soon … or ever … Yahoo TV explained that “the duck hunter” had “sparked controversy last week after he made several homophobic and racially-charged remarks in an interview published in the Janurary 2014 issue of GQ.”

“Homophobic and racially-charged”? Un-ducking-believable. Whew … you gotta wonder if the writer actually read the interview.

Author Larry Correia pointed out in a very readable blog (link below) that “most of the people who have their panties in a twist about Robertson’s hatemongery have not read the actual article in question. Even with a totally unbiased GQ reporter, it isn’t that bad, but you wouldn’t know it from all the caring liberal* outrage today.” [Note from CtH: Add a /sarc tag to that “totally unbiased” thing.]

At the bottom, he has a note for the starred word liberal:

*One quick note for all you whiny No-Labels types. I’m going to use the word LIBERAL to describe liberals acting like liberals. You’ll live. Obviously, not all liberals are in favor of squashing dissenting opinions or disallowing someone from holding personal religious beliefs, but everybody trying to squash dissenting beliefs about today’s topic is either a liberal, statist, communist, socialist, or just being a dick. So yes I know that YOU personally are a special snowflake different from said stereotype, but I’m too lazy to keep typing that out, and to use some helpful stereotypes to explain, I’m a greedy, right-wing capitalist 1%er who needs to get back to work writing more bestselling novels that promote violence against the differently-living. Save the hate mail. It gets really repetitive. And when I use the term “caring liberal” it is for the special ones who keep threatening to murder me, because irony amuses me.

So, about these deep thinkers who have opinions about what they haven’t actually read … let’s be real clear that the quote/unquote totally unbiased GQ reporter is a Pansy Leftard. I mean … his FIRST point was about the “huge” crossbow Phil had “cocked and loaded, just in case a deer stumbles in front of us and we need to do a redneck drive-by on the poor bastard, but the safety is on. SAFETY FIRST.”

In amongst that “OMG where is gun control when you need it” introduction, Pansy Man also mentions the unused seat belts in their vehicle, the fly in Phil’s beard, and how “Phil is telling me all about the land around us and how the animals are a glorious gift from God and how blowing their heads off is part of His plan for us.”

Then he goes on to explain that “Phil calls himself a Bible-thumper, and holy shit, he thumps that Bible hard enough to ring the bell at a county-fair test of strength.

I include these quotations in order to give context to the rest of the article, which allegedly contains such steaming piles of HOMOPHOBIA that as soon as GLAAD members awoke from their swoons, they immediately tweeted their outrage to A&E demanding the removal of this horrible man they have never met from a television show they have never watched.

In the article, Phil Robertson says he believes that homosexuality is a sin. 

Were Leftards expecting something different from this out-spoken Christian? Good grief.

I admit I was surprised by the Yahoo TV author’s claim about “racially-charged” remarks, so I went back and looked at the interview again. All I could find was a Phil quote:

“I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks, because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field…. They’re singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!… Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.”

So he worked side by side with blacks who weren’t bitter. Right. I can totally see the RAAAAAAAAAAACISM in that. Or rather, I could if I were a Leftard. But I digress.

The GQ interview also mentioned that Phil has a biracial grandson who is named for his adoptive dad, Will. Do RAAAAAAAACISTS adopt biracial kids? And if they do, do they then give them the primo paternal moniker? I think not.

But what the hey. Leftards are not called tards for nothing, know what I’m saying? Speaking of which, here’s another prime quote from the ass who interviewed Phil for GQ:

“For what it’s worth—and since I actually looked it up—the violent-crime rate here in America has plummeted since 1990, even as church attendance has stayed the same. And, of course, Phil is conveniently ignoring centuries upon centuries of war, bloodshed, and human enslavement committed in the name of Christ. But I doubt any of that would sway Phil. And anyway, I’m a guest in his house and he is my welcoming host, so I smile politely and nod like the milquetoast suburban WASP that I am. If you can’t reconcile some of the things Phil says with his otherwise friendly demeanor—perhaps because you are gay, or a duck—I don’t blame you. And I don’t blame Duck Dynasty for keeping the show safely apolitical, ensuring smooth digestion for a mass audience.”

Could he be any MORE condescending? Is adding some self-deprecating remarks supposed to make his raging Redneckist Christianophobia palatable? What. A. Jerk.

So, yeah, Phil said (shockeroo), the Bible says homosexuality is a sin and Phil believes it. He also said,

“We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ’em out later, you see what I’m saying?”

Racist homophobe? ::snort:: I don’t think so. And fershure, Phil is a lot less judgmental than Pansy Man and the “Fire Phil-istines.”

I’ve often suspected that what A&E originally intended is not what they got. Pat Archbold wrote:

The whole idea of the show was to parade these nouveau riche Christian hillbillies around so that we could laugh at them. … When the producers saw the way the show was shaping up, different than they envisioned it, they tried to change course.

They tried to get the Robertson’s to tone down their Christianity, but to their eternal credit they refused. They tried to add fake cussin’ to the show by inserting bleeps where no cussword was uttered. At best, they wanted to make the Robertson’s look like crass buffoons. At worst they wanted them to look like hypocrites.

They desperately wanted us to laugh at the Robertsons. Instead, we loved them. … A&E had a conundrum. They knew who the Robertsons were and what they believe and they still held it in disdain. But they really liked the money. Really liked the money. So they lived with it. But the progressives whose bank accounts were not growing fatter because of these backward rubes were never inclined to look the other way.

They hate the show and they really hate the response to the show. They want it destroyed. Many magazines and interviewers have tried to get the Robertsons to trip up so they could pounce. When Phil backed the Christian viewpoint on homosexuality and added some personal asides about how he just couldn’t understand it, they had their moment.

But you know what? God had a plan too. And my guess is that the plan included this controversy which, from my reading, is costing the Left some support, because there really are liberals out there who are not Leftards, who believe in goofy things like not punishing people for saying stuff right out loud.

As for A&E, UK’s Daily Mail reports that the network is planning to air the umpteen episodes of Duck Dynasty they’ve already shot … episodes with Phil in them. And maybe by the next season, they’ll just keep on filming and making money while the anti-Christian H8Rs shift their sights to new targets.

Sources:

Comments Off on Un-ducking-believable

Filed under Christianity, Media Bias, Phil Robertson