Daily Archives: October 9, 2012
We have stuck together since the late 1950s for the sake of the kids, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course. Let’s just chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our separate ways, okay?
Dividing up our joint property should be easy.
Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take all the firearms, the cops, the NRA, and the military. You can have all the peace-niks and war protesters.
We will also take the nasty, smelly oil, gas and coal industries, as well as the dangerous nuclear power plants. You can have all the wind, solar and bio-diesel you can find. We expect to keep Air Force One, Al Gore’s fleet of SUV’s and all the private jets of every Hollywood celebrity who has donated to Obama, since none of them will run on anything but fossil fuels. Good luck finding any “green” vehicle big enough to transport Oprah, Michael Moore, and Rosie O’Donnell to their new, carbon-neutral digs.
We don’t like redistributive taxes, so you can keep those. We’ll take capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart, and Wall Street.
We’ll keep the Bible, Judeo-Christian values and the right to invade and hammer dangerous people who threaten us or our allies. You can have NBC, Hollywood, Situational Ethics, Political Correctness and Shirley MacLaine.
You can also have the U.N. membership. We’re sick of paying for something we never use anyway.
We’ll take the Constitution, The Battle Hymn of the Republic, The National Anthem, God Bless America, the Pledge of Allegiance and the Red, White and Blue. You can have Jonathan Seagull, Imagine, I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya, We Are the World and the Obama Flag.
Admittedly, it will be more difficult to equably divide the land. We propose this be the last task given to the current Supreme Court. After the divorce is finalized and everyone has moved to whichever new nation they prefer, you can have your four fave judges and we’ll take ours. We’ll flip for Roberts.
Click on graphic to embiggen.
We give thanks to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, praying always for you, since we heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of your love for all the saints. Colossians 1:3-4
We humbly come before You and ask that Your Spirit reach across the lands to all who are hurting and spiritually lost. Restore their hearts with hope everlasting; comfort them with Your tender, loving arms. May we be sensitive to their needs, whether physical or spiritual, and be eager and willing to share Your love for them, just as You have bestowed Your love upon us.
posted by Pistol Pete
Still can’t upload pictures.
I have a TON of videos.It may take awhile,but I’ll get most of them posted eventually.
Two days ago, the Obama campaign blasted out another email claiming a report by Princeton economist Harvey Rosen says Romney’s tax cuts would require large tax increases on families making between $100,000 and $200,000.
Rosen says he has no idea how the Obama campaign “reached that characterization of my work.”
Sounds to me like a polite way of saying, “WTF did they come up with THAT?!”
According to Rosen himself (not Obama’s version of Rosen), the main conclusion of his study of Romney’s plan was that it could work just the way Romney says it would.
He also says the Tax Policy Center report, the one Obama referred to at the first debate, has three huge flaws in its assumptions.
(1) The TPC report assumes pro-growth tax reform can’t actually produce economic growth, when stimulating economic growth is the WHOLE POINT of the Romney tax cut plan.
(2) The TPC report assumes two tax expenditures worth $45 billion per year are not ‘on the table’ when they MOST DEFINITELY ARE.
(3) The TPC report assumes the costs of Obamacare are still in the budget, when Romney has been clear about REPEALING Obamacare.
Rosen says when you correct for these erroneous assumptions, Romney’s math checks out.
You can check the math yourself @ http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/check-math-romneys-tax-plan-doesnt-raise-middle-class-taxes_653485.html
October 8, 2012 – Princeton Economist: Obama Campaign Is Misrepresenting My Study on Romney’s Tax Plan
October 4, 2012 – Princeton Economist: The Math Behind Romney’s Tax Plan Adds Up
October 3, 2012 Check the Math: Romney’s Tax Plan Doesn’t Raise Middle Class Taxes