The latest incarnation of Teh Won’s incarnation

Evidence has been leaking out for years now that Obama’s birth narrative is a Big Fat Lie. More and more people want to see PROOF that this man is actually eligible to hold his high and powerful office. Most recently, Israel jumped on the birther wagon. Fast forward to September 13th. Methinks Teh Won is softening up his kool-aid drinkers to the impending release of his real birth certificate.

If you like this, you might also want to read @ https://polination.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/israel-weighs-in-on-birth-certificate/

Source @ http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/obama-changes-his-story-born-to-a-single-mom/

 

16 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama

16 responses to “The latest incarnation of Teh Won’s incarnation

  1. Wow! Maybe what we’re not realizing here is that Ann was just a “composite mother.” You know, an amalgamation of several real world women who raised him in the old Soviet Union sleeper spy training center. He probably came from a petri dish anyway. 😉

    Truly, it’s shocking how amorphous his background is. You could be right that this is an attempt to begin to “change the narrative.” We know some kind of big distraction is coming. This could be it.

    Like

    • chrissythehyphenated

      I just learned that the gnats in my kitchen are probably breeding in the scum down inside the drain, above the water in the trap. I pulled my drain trap thingie do out and holy moly, it was all scummy with mold underneath. So maybe now that’s clean, the gnats will stop flying up my nose. … Point being, scummy drains as breeding ground for unwanted pests were on my mind when I read your “petri dish” remark. ::snort::

      Like

    • well Grunt, a single mother and no father is what would appeal to all those bastards who are now voters 🙂

      Like

      • chrissythehyphenated

        Their only “god” is the letter D on their voter ballots. The SAME PEOPLE who were screaming bloody murder over Anita Hill and “sexual abuse in the workplace” were yawning and fawning over Clinton and Lewinsky. They then turned around and hurled vile racist and misogynistic epithets at Condi Rice, who did nothing but be a successful black, female REPUBLICAN. And now they’ve got Sandra Fluke demanding free birth control, while they’re cutting health benefits to female soldiers.

        IOW, they will not give a crap what the birth certificate says. BUT, they’re in the minority. The UNDECIDEDS will care a LOT.

        And, just like Andrew Breitbart did over the Clarence Thomas hearings, the teetering-on-the-edge-of-disgust-with-Democrats will also care, wake up, pour their kool-aid down the drain and maybe, we can hope, start reading Thomas Sowell etc. and get their American heads on straight.

        Like

        • Chrissy you summed it up perfectly. Yes, I remember each of those incidents but am a bit hazy on the Anita Hill stuff.

          Over here we still have reporters who want creepy to win the Presidency. It is unreal.

          Like

          • chrissythehyphenated

            When the Senate was holding confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas to become a Supreme Court Justice, the Left brought in this woman, Anita Hill, who had worked with him for a while years before. According to her, he had made some “suggestive” comments she found offensive. That’s it. Comments. Maybe off color, maybe not. Other people who were there and heard the same things said he hadn’t been inappropriate and, more to the point, SHE hadn’t made anything of them UNTIL HE WAS UP FOR SCOTUS.

            Like

            • yes I know about all of that, but I do not remember it hitting the Australian press to any great degree.

              However, Clinton’s dalliances did hit the news over here, and I could never understand how people voted for him when they knew he was a cad.

              Like

              • chrissythehyphenated

                I didn’t pay attention to the CT/AH thing at the time, but Breitbart watched it on C-SPAN and it turned him into a conservative. I only caught up when Lewinsky happened and I heard folks saying what a bunch of hypocrites the lefties were being considering CT/AH. They’re pulling the same thing now with all the “disrespect” for the president crap. Compared with the way they treated Bush, the worst any right winger has done is go neener neener at BHO. Sheesh.

                Like

                • You got that right. I am about to write another post on the subject of the attack in Benghazi.

                  The White House is sticking to the line that it was spontaneous. However, even the Libyan government disagrees. They have stated that some of those involved crossed the border at Mali and Algeria and neither are anywhere near Benghazi!! They had been there several months.

                  My new post will be to skewer that dreadful Susan Rice.

                  Like

  2. I always figured that the inconsistency in Obama’s stories about his past were because he wasn’t even “present” for most of it. /sarc/

    Like

  3. Um, now, let’s not attribute to something what could be something something… We know the stuttering clusterfluke of a miserable failure is a mumbling fumbler who can’t remember his own religion or date of birth. Makes Joe Biden look like an eloquent and erudite encomiast (okay, I just found that last word; I didn’t pull it out of my brain). Thus, you can’t expect the mental midget is saying what he means if he’s off-prompter. Commie Mommy was a single mom for much of the time. He may have just meant “raised by” instead of “born to.” Never attribute to manipulation of the narrative what can be attributed to gross stupididity. That was it.

    Like

    • chrissythehyphenated

      If you rearrange the letters in encomiastic, you get cosmetician. (I got that on the web too. Had to look up encomiastic! LOL)

      As for manipulation vs. stupidity … if it was an off prompter boo boo, would they have tweeted it? I don’t think so.

      Like

  4. Pingback: BHO’s real dad taught him to love jazz | PoliNation