Get ready for the fan!

Disclaimer: Below is a compendium of resources available through WND. Now … WND offers some really out-there stuff that I often find way too tinfoil hat for my consumption. That being said, they’ve been on top of the Obama eligibility thing for years and have the best data base I am aware of. Maybe the two are linked. What mainstream news organization could have gotten away with it? Even the PTBs in the GOP won’t touch anything tainted by the stench of “birtherism.”

But all that is changing. Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse has been cleared of all charges, the Democrats PTBs are on notice that they cannot certify Obama eligibility without bringing down perjury charges on their heads, leading Democrats refused to go to the convention, reporters are complaining that Obama is an ass and the mainstream media’s blockade on negative Obama stories is crumbling.

My hope for the upcoming weeks is that some of the Democrat leaders in some of the critical states will draw the line at risking jail time for Barack and refuse to certify he is eligible. This will force him to choose between getting on those ballots or producing his REAL birth certificate.

I think he’ll go with the latter. Said revelations will make no difference to his most loyal base, any more than the Monica Lewinsky revelations did. Being a Left-Wing Democrat is a religion to these people and they are every bit as unthinking and belligerent about their beliefs as the worst of the worst in any recognized world religion.

But just as Clinton’s perjury and sexual abuse of an intern his daughter’s age mattered a LOT to thinking voters, so too will Obama’s lies (and birth record forgeries) matter a LOT. The next couple of months will be ever so entertaining!

I’m passing on the resources below so that you can prepare yourself to be knowledgable when the you-know-what HITS THE FAN!!  WND has marked everything down to bargain prices because time is short to make a difference. I have ordered the listing by price, lowest to highest.


INTRODUCTION TO THE SUBJECT – A short, sweet and cheap 32-page paperback for one dollar @

BUMPER STICKERS – “Where’s the Real Birth Certificate?” bumper stickers @

THE FIRST BOOK – While supplies last, hardcover copies of the first bestselling book to explore the eligibility issue in depth, “The Manchurian President” @


OLDER DVD – Marked down and only while supplies last. “A Question of Eligibility” @

EVEN OLDER DVD – Aug 19, 2009 “For the Record: I’m Not Crazy” @


COLD CASE POSSE – Jerome Corsi and Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo have collaborated on an e-book called “A Question of Eligibility: A Law-Enforcement Investigation into Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate and His Eligibility to be President.” Purchasers will get free downloadable updates of the latest information and findings whenever there’s breaking news. Read more @


NEW DVD – “Dreams from My Real Father: A Story of Reds and Deception” by filmmaker Joel Gilbert. He purports that known communist operator Frank Marshall Davis was Obama’s biological father and chief mentor. Read more @

DISCLAIMER from CtH: There is no question in my mind that Davis was a deeply important, father-like figure to Obama in those critical years when a boy is becoming a man. But I do not buy that Davis was Obama’s sperm donor. See my argument at the end.

CORSI’S ORIGINAL BOOK – I read this when it came out. It’s excellent. They’re offering autographed hardbacks and including Corsi’s e-book update for free! Read more @


YARD SIGNS – “Where’s the Real Birth Certificate?” @


MORE STUFF – Postcards, special reports, OTHER bumper stickers, T-shirts and more @

RE: My skepticism about Davis as BHO baby daddy rests on two pieces of evidence.

One, I have never seen any reason given, credible or otherwise, for why the Dunham family up and moved to Hawaii when they did. The parents both had jobs, they all had friends and a life in Seattle. Why would a family suddenly uproot all that just when the only child is about to head into all the trauma and expense of college?  How about an unwed pregnancy?

Two, we have documentary evidence from outside the Obama camp (college transcripts, published street directories) demonstrating that Ann lived with her parents and attended college classes in the fall semester (1960) in Hawaii, then lived at home, but did not attend classes during the spring or summer (1961). Then, come the end of August, 1961, allegedly just weeks after the birth of Baby Barack, this single teen-aged mother is living in and attending college classes in Seattle, WA. NOT!

I’ve given birth and raised 3 daughters. From both points of view, the only birth sequence that makes any sense of Ann’s residence and college transcripts is the one that also explains the Dunham’s sudden move to Hawaii. That is, Ann got knocked up by a black boy in Seattle at the end of her senior year in high school, she went to classes in the fall when her baby bump was small enough to hide under the loose clothing common in Hawaii, then stayed at home and out of sight during her last months of pregnancy and first months of motherhood.

I believe Barack’s real birth date is likely to be 3/4/61. If I was organizing a fake birth record for my grandson’s bogus green card daddy, I’d pick a birth date INS would believe that was also easy to fake off the real one. 3/4/61 is easy to change to 8/4/61. A March birth fits the knocked up in Seattle scenario and the August date fits the time delay required by Ann having not met Barack Sr. until the fall of 1960 in Hawaii.

The INS-inspired August birth date also explains why a very young, allegedly “in love” and newlywed mom would live neither with her husband nor with her doting parents while caring for a baby and attending college classes. She was a freshman and already matriculted in Hawaii, for goodness sake. The only explanation that makes any sense of her move to Seattle is that they had to hide the baby from INS until he was old enough that his age was not obvious and/or the green card daddy had left Hawaii.

If you’ve watched babies grow, you know how easy it is to tell a newborn from a six month old baby. Corsi reports that when Ann moved to Seattle with her baby, she visited a high school friend. In the friend’s FIRST interview, she said the baby appeared to be about six months old. Every interview after that, she had her lesson down pat and in line with the official narrative. The baby was “a newborn.”

Suuure he was. And I totally believe that Ann, her doting parents and her “new husband” collaborated in moving her and that little baby thousands of miles away … so she could struggle with sleepless nights, diapers, childcare, housework, shopping, college classes and homework all on her own. /sarc

Hiding Baby Barry from the INS in Hawaii makes sense not only of Ann’s move to Seattle, but also of her move back to Hawaii shortly after Barack Sr. was graduated and moved to Boston. With faux daddy gone, INS no longer mattered. Plus, by then Barry was a toddler. I know from experience that you cannot tell how old a toddler really is. I babysat for a 2 year old once who was as tall and as verbally precocious as any ordinary 4 year old and I had friends whose premie was so teensy weensy at 2, it was kind of weird how coordinated and clever she was.

On another note, Obama clearly knows his own birth story. Given the likelihood of the above … don’t you have to wonder what degree of self-loathing our ultra-pro-abortion president must harbor, knowing that he was the “punishment” for his mother’s mistake and that, had he been conceived just a few years later, would have been flushed down the toilet at Seattle Planned Parenthood clinic?


Filed under Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Democrats, Frank Marshall Davis

10 responses to “Get ready for the fan!

  1. What A Hoot

    great resource and insight.


  2. This is good stuff, and it explains a lot, but how do you reconcile it with the existence of FMD’s nude photos of SAD taken at his house in November of 1960? In the shots from Joel Gilbert’s book, Ann looks pretty flat-tummied, but, if your theory is right, she would have given birth just 3 months later.


    • chrissythehyphenated

      I found the photos so distasteful, I did not explore that issue. But they’re not compelling as evidence.

      So far as I know, there is no proof they were taken by Davis, though he was a known perv, so that part is easy to believe. There’s no proof they are of Ann. The woman could be someone similar looking. (Consider how much Tina Fey and Sarah Palin resemble one another.)

      And who is to say they were taken in November of 1960? Ann and Frank are both dead. Anyone could’ve put nudie pics of a look-alike woman on the internet, just the same as Obama put two fake birth certificates out.

      Ann’s transcripts, though, are certified by both colleges, match the city directory listings and all the details slot neatly with what was in Barack Sr’s Hawaiian INS folder that was obtained from Freedom of Information.


      • I don’t blame you, and I haven’t read Joel’s book or seen his DVD, so I don’t know all the evidence he provides, but from what he’s said in the trailer and on his website, it’s clear that those photos are really confirmed as FMD’s, provided by him, and dated to 1960 and not just found on the internet. Distasteful or not, they represent very compelling evidence, in my view, in light of other circumstantial facts. Paul Kengor, for example, in his Blaze interview admits that those photos are actually of SAD, Obama’s mother, before pooh-poohing them and going on to make other less-controversial points of his own. Excuse me? I find it a little strange that everybody is in a rush to discount such a smoking gun. If that was, in fact, SAD in those pictures, and they were taken by FMD, you can’t tell me there was no chance of a sexual relationship between those two, and that it’s not compelling. Add in other facts, like BHO’s physical resemblance to FMD, Stanley’s (Ann’s dad) friendship with FMD, FMD’s writings of the free-love time period including a story about a conquest of a white girl named “Anne,” and it gets hard to dismiss out of hand.

        What I’d really like to hear that would help me dismiss Joel’s story is evidence that the timing was all wrong or that Stanley(dad) never really associated with FMD while in Honolulu. So far, I haven’t seen anybody present that, but I could have missed it. Everybody just wishes it away and doesn’t want to go there. And last year over at the CTH, when we were arguing with Mark Davis, FMD’s son who still lives in Hawaii, he seemed awfully slippery in insisting that there was no evidence that BHO and FMD ever met, despite Barack’s own words to the contrary. I don’t blame him for trying to distance his dad from Barack, but the way he did it didn’t ring true. He was just using classic Alinsky denials without substance.

        Also, you say that the only explanation for the Dunhams’ move to Hawaii was an unplanned pregnancy. That could be, but to support that, it might be necessary to discredit the idea that they were there because of FMD. I’m not sure how to do that, though. The whole family history is pretty murky.


        • chrissythehyphenated

          I didn’t say the “only explanation” was a pregnancy, just that it was a likely one that fit the evidence I knew about. However, I had not heard any of this stuff about the photos being genuine.

          I would be unsurprised to learn that FMD had had sexual relationships with both SAD and BHO Jr. or that dear old Stan was complicit. Stan was a creep from all I’ve heard, that poem B (allegedly) wrote (FMD probably wrote it) has very obvious sexual references in it and FMD was apparently proud of his bisexual, any age, anything goes pleasure seeking.

          If the photos were taken in November 1960, then my theory is out the window. No way she was six months preggers in them. But … I just cannot get past the absurdity of an August 4 birth date and Ann’s matriculation in Seattle.


      • I was looking at the 2008 UK Telegraph article about Frank and Stan’s relationship, and I stumbled on this: “Mrs Weatherly-Williams said that the poet was first introduced to the future Democratic presidential candidate in 1970 at the age of 10.” Hmmm. That fits your timeline pretty well. If Barack was really born in March instead of August, he would better fit the “age 10 in 1970” statement. Either way, Mrs. W-M’s statement overestimates Barack’s age in 1970. Strange.