Monthly Archives: June 2012

Do Democrats do ANY work?

Rand Paul gave a scathing rebuke to the Democrat-majority Senate on Friday for not giving anyone time to read the bills they bring up for vote.

As evidence, he held up a 600-page bill they’d gotten that same morning and were going to vote on in 30 minutes!

The Senate’s own rules say that bills have to be posted online for at least 48 hours before being voted on, but this 600-page violation had stuff that had been stuck into it the night before that had nothing to do with the bill itself!

Paul announced he had presented a bill to Congress that says legislators should read the bills before we pass them.

Somebody has to place a bill before Congress saying that Congress should DO ITS JOB?

No wonder their approval rating is in the toilet!

Paul also reminded everyone that the Democrat leadership has not produced a budget in three years. That’s also against the rules.

They bitch about how “obstructionist” Republicans are, but even when Republicans wrote a budget FOR them, they refused to vote on it.

Senator Paul was definitely frustrated as he asked,

“How are we going to get to compromise if they don’t show up for work? How are we going to get anything done if they don’t obey their own rules?”

Read the rest of “Rand Paul Tears Dem Senators A New One” @

As for their fearless leader …

Click on graphics to embiggen.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

If you like this, you might also enjoy @


Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Rand Paul, Republicans, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate

Obama vs. Romney

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @


Filed under Barack Obama, Mitt Romney

DNC Exec Gaspard – Keeping it classy!

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

Click on graphic to embiggen.

If you like this, you might also enjoy @

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

Chrissy’s Site Bites @


Filed under Democrats, Obamacare, Supreme Court

Democrats stage walk-out

June 28, 2012: The Republican-majority House of Representatives voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder for criminal contempt of Congress.

The Vote: 255 YEA vs. 65 NAY. Seventeen Democrats voted YEA.

149 Democrats stormed out in a huff, refusing to vote as a demonstration of their contempt for the contempt vote. It’s a shame the figures in this video are so small. I can’t tell if these immature whiners are waddling like the toddlers with loaded diapers that they apparently are channeling. Were they all singing “Neener neener neener” as well?

Democrats “Walk it Out” on House GOP Contempt Vote on Attorney General Eric Holder [:28]

On the plus side, The Holder vote kept House Democrats too busy to do much crowing at disappointed Republicans over the failure of SCOTUS to overturn ObamaCare that same morning.

Not that I care if they crow. IMHO, the Supreme Court did us all a favor by refusing to let 5 guys in robes make such a far-reaching decision the way they did with Roe v. Wade. That kind of thing belongs in the legislature where voters have more power.

Plus, now that SCOTUS has officially ruled that the “buy health insurance or else” mandate is a TAX, we have more fodder for November to throw at the Obama Democrats who swear they never raised any taxes on the middle class.

Even better, those who were ONLY concerned about overturning ObamaCare will now be highly motivated to jump into the fray and work alongside the rest of us to get the Obama Democrats OUT OF OFFICE.

H/t to Pete for source @


Filed under Democrats, Eric Holder, Obamacare, Republicans, Supreme Court, Taxes


Posted by Pistol Pete

I had not intended to post today,considering the world-class funk I’m in.Yet after yesterday my loyalty to you precludes my personal foibles.I plan to shut down my computer today and leave the television off for awhile.The kids bought me Edward Klein’s ‘The Amateur’ for Fathers Day and I’m going to take the time to read it.My thoughts are going to seem disjointed and subject to rambling because there are a lot of informational fragments I need to clear.

I’m listening yesterday and I hear:Obama won today,but this will really fire up the Tea Party.Fire up for what?Does that mean we’ll run into the voting place instead of walk?Most people already had their minds made up and what happened yesterday did nothing to change that.As expected,democrats behaved like spoiled children who stick their tongue out at you because they got away with something with no punishment.They’re sore winners and even sorer(sorer?) losers the few times it happens.

Looking at Chrissy’s post about SCOTUS nominees,it seems democrat presidents ALWAYS!! appoint reliably liberal judges.With Republican nominees its a crapshoot.The trouble with these stealth nominees is that conservatives are never pleasantly surprised.Ever.Such was the case with Benedict Roberts yesterday.


There were rumors he switched his vote at the eleventh hour,perhaps due to bullying by The Usurper.In his opinion he stated that they were not responsible for the bloodthirsty pieces of liberal shit the ignorant masses vote into office.(OK,I took a little,well,a lot of poetic license).

Obamacare was rejected on the four points it was brought up on,so Roberts invented a fifth,about the mandate being a tax by himself,out of whole cloth.It is sad I will not live long enough to see us rid of the Jewish lesbian,the ‘Wise Latina’ and Benedict Roberts.We’re stuck with them for the next 20-30 years.

Give the democrats credit for doing their homework.They rejected every decent judge Bush nominated to the courts until they saw one they could turn.Remember Miguel Estrada?He languished for two years before he withdrew his own nomination,because the dems saw him as a potential nominee to SCOTUS.They were able to do this thanks to McShame and his ‘Gang of 14’ that snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

I will continue my mindless diatribe in the comments.I have to refill my coffee cup anyway.


Filed under Obamacare, Supreme Court

SCOTUS says ObamaCare is a TAX

September 12, 2008: Candidate Obama makes a “firm pledge” not to raise taxes OF ANY KIND on ANYONE making less than $250,00 a year.

July 13, 2009: President Obama makes a “promise” that Americans $250,000 a year or less will not see any new taxes.

June 28, 2012: Supreme Court Declares Obamacare Constitutional as a Tax

Summary of The Heritage Foundation opinion on the Obamacare SCOTUS decision

Today’s Supreme Court decision on Obamacare has two significant constitutional silver linings, because the Court put some temporary brakes on our republic’s descent down an extra-constitutional slippery slope in which the federal government can control any aspect of our lives.

1) Five justices opined that the mandate, standing alone, cannot be justified under the Commerce Clause or the Necessary and Proper Clause. This is a serious blow to 90 percent of the legal academics and about 90 percent of Congress, since these have been the clauses used to justify so much of the modern administrative state.

2) Seven justices seemed to agree that some constitutional limitations were breached in the Medicaid expansion. This itself is a landmark ruling.

The American people and their elected representatives have a lot of work to do to repeal and replace the Obamacare statute. One political reality of today’s decision is that the Court essentially reads Obamacare as a massive tax increase, which falls most heavily on the middle class. Didn’t someone promise not to do that?

Read the rest @

Full text of SCOTUS decision on ObamaCare

Summary of RedState opinion on ObamaCare SCOTUS decision

As you have no doubt heard by now, the Supreme Court largely upheld Obamacare with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority 5 to 4 decision.  Even Justice Kennedy called for the whole law to be thrown out, but John Roberts saved it.

Having gone through the opinion, I am not going to beat up on John Roberts. I am disappointed, but I want to make a few points. John Roberts is playing at a different game than the rest of us. We’re on poker. He’s on chess.

First, I get the strong sense from a few anecdotal stories about Roberts over the past few months and the way he has written this opinion that he very, very much was concerned about keeping the Supreme Court above the partisan fray and damaging the reputation of the Court long term. It seems to me the left was smart to make a full frontal assault on the Court as it persuaded Roberts.

Second, in writing his opinion, Roberts forces everyone to deal with the issue as a political, not a legal issue. In the past twenty years, Republicans have punted a number of issues to the Supreme Court asking the Court to save us from ourselves. They can’t do that with Roberts. They tried with McCain-Feingold, which was originally upheld. This case is a timely reminder to the GOP that five votes are not a sure thing.

Third, while Roberts has expanded the taxation power, which I don’t really think is a massive expansion from what it was, Roberts has curtailed the commerce clause as an avenue for Congressional overreach. In so doing, he has affirmed the Democrats are massive taxers. In fact, I would argue that this may prevent future mandates in that no one is going to go around campaigning on new massive tax increases. On the upside, I guess we can tax the hell out of abortion now. Likewise, in a 7 to 2 decision, the Court shows a strong majority still recognize the concept of federalism and the restrains of Congress in forcing states to adhere to the whims of the federal government.

Fourth, in forcing us to deal with this politically, the Democrats are going to have a hard time running to November claiming the American people need to vote for them to preserve Obamacare. It remains deeply, deeply unpopular with the American people. If they want to make a vote for them a vote for keeping a massive tax increase, let them try.

Fifth, the decision totally removes a growing left-wing talking point that suddenly they must vote for Obama because of judges. The Supreme Court as a November issue for the left is gone. For the right? That sound you hear is the marching of libertarians into Camp Romney, with noses held, knowing that the libertarian and conservative coalitions must unite to defeat Obama and Obamacare.

Finally, while I am not down on John Roberts like many of you are today, I will be very down on Congressional Republicans if they do not now try to shut down the individual mandate. Force the Democrats on the record about the mandate. Defund Obamacare. This now, by necessity, is a political fight and the GOP sure as hell should fight.

60% of Americans agree with them on the issue. And guess what? The Democrats have been saying for a while that individual pieces of Obamacare are quite popular. With John Roberts’ opinion, the repeal fight takes place on GOP turf, not Democrat turf. The all or nothing repeal has always been better ground for the GOP and now John Roberts has forced everyone onto that ground.

It seems very, very clear to me in reviewing John Roberts’ decision that he is playing a much longer game than us and can afford to with a life tenure. And he probably just handed Mitt Romney the White House.

*A friend points out one other thing — go back to 2009. Olympia Snowe was the deciding vote to get Obamacare out of the Senate Committee. Had she voted no, we’d not be here now.

Read the rest @

1 Comment

Filed under Obamacare, Supreme Court, Taxes

Court rules for Florida




Filed under Voter ID


The individual mandate did not survive under the commerce clause,but survived as congress’ ability to tax.Other parts,including states mandated to cover more people under medicaid survived.Roberts voted along with the four leftist judges.



Filed under Supreme Court, Taxes


Posted by Pistol Pete


Got a late start today because of a delay getting my papers delivered.The Obamacare ruling may be announced before I finish.If so,we’ll play itby ear.




Filed under Loose Pollen

Good news in Ohio

Click on graphics to embiggen.

In 2012, Ohio will be worth 18 electoral votes.

In 1980, Reagan won Ohio by 10.6%.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

In 2008, Obama won Ohio by 4.58%.

Chrissy’s Site Bites @

Support for Romney has shown a slow, but steady increase.

Nov 2011: Obama 50% vs Romney 41%

Jan 2012: Obama 49% vs Romney 42%

May 2012: Obama 50% vs Romney 43%

Jun 2012: Obama 47% vs Romney 44%

Meanwhile, Obama’s approval numbers took a big hit in the past month.

May 2012: Obama Approval 48% vs Disapproval 48%

Jun 2012: Obama Approval 44% vs Disapproval 51%

His support among his own base dropped 5%.

May 2012: Obama Democrats 88%

Jun 2012: Obama Democrats 83%

If you like this, you might also enjoy @


Comments Off on Good news in Ohio

Filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Elections, Mitt Romney, Polls, Republicans, Ronald Reagan