THE FRIDAY GRUDGE

Posted by Pistol Pete

HIS ABOMINATIONS ACCERLERATE

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/02/03/his-abominations-accelerate

WOOKIE CRANKS OUT 25 PUSHUPS ON THE ELLEN DEGENERATE SHOW

What a glowing example for women in this country

http://thehill.com/video/administration/208289-michelle-obama-cranks-out-25-push-ups-on-ellen

THE CASE FOR ROMNEY

A president who owes you is better than one who owns you

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290033/case-romney-jonah-goldberg

JIM MORAN,RACIST PIG

A completely unbiased opinion from Michelle Malkin

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290042/jim-moran-racist-pig-michelle-malkin

ANTI-WHITE RACE WARRIOR JESSE JACKASS SAYS OBAMA MAY BE ASSASSINATED DUE TO JAN BREWER,ALLEN WEST

All Jesse wanted to do was cut his nuts off.

http://patdollard.com/2012/02/anti-white-race-warrior-jesse-jackson-says-obama-may-be-assassinated-due-to-jan-brewer-allen-west/

OBAMA AT PRAYER BREAKFAST: ‘I HAVE FALLEN ON MY KNEES WITH GREAT REGULARITY’

But only when speaking to foreign dictators…or George Soros

http://news.investors.com/Article.aspx?id=599842&p=1&ibdbot=1

CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN OBAMA’S SECOND TERM

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/02/03/civil-disobedience-in-obamas-s

JAN. JOBS RISE 243,00;JOBLESS RATE 8.3%

Capitalism surviving in spite of obama

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/january-us-jobs-rise-243000-jobless-rate-83-2012-02-03

RECORD 1.2 MILLION DROP OUT OF LABOR FORCE–LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION TUMBLES TO NEW 30 YEAR LOW

These are not counted in the unemployment figures…but you’ll never hear a word about this.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/record-12-million-people-fall-out-labor-force-one-month-labor-force-participation-rate-tumbles

ACLU FIGHTS SUNSHINE IN WISCONSIN RECALL

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/aclu_fights_sunshine_in_wisconsin_recall.html

U.N. CONSIDERS ‘GLOBAL TAX’ TO FUND ‘SOCIAL PROTECTION’ SERVICES FOR THE POOR

Let me translate that: “Hey,lets take more American taxpayer money to enrich ourselves and our friends.Who cares about our poor?”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/u-n-leaders-consider-world-tax-to-fund-social-protection-services-for-the-poor/

CATHY McMORRIS RODGERS COULD BE FALL VICE PRESIDENTIAL SURPRISE

http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/03/cathy-mcmorris-rodgers-could-be-the-fall-vice-presidential-surprise/

MAJOR PARTY SHIFT AMONG JEWISH VOTERS

Without the Jewses,Obama loses(I just made that up)

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/major_party_shift_among_jewish_voters.html

VIGILANTE FILMS AND THE LEFT

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290029/vigilante-films-and-left-anthony-paletta

WHY DID KOMEN FOUNDATION STOP FUNDING PLANNED PARENTHOOD?THEY DON’T DO MAMMOGRAMS.PERIOD.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/why-did-komen-stop-funding-planned-parenthood-they-dont-do-mammograms-period/

21 Comments

Filed under Allen West, Barack Obama, Elections, Jan Brewer, Jesse Jackson, Michelle Obama, Mitt Romney, Planned Parenthood, Taxes, Unemployment, United Nations

21 responses to “THE FRIDAY GRUDGE

  1. So, after taking in more than twice their normal amount of donations, Komen reverses in their tracks – NOT COOL! Those people were deceived and should get their money back. They wanted it to go to breast cancer related services, not abortion.
    http://news.yahoo.com/komen-drops-plan-cut-planned-parenthood-grants-163643930.html

    Like

    • I hope everyone who donated to Komen in response to its no-funding-for-PP decision will demand a refund. PP does nothing to cure breast cancer, and in fact performs medical procedures that increase a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer in the first place.

      Like

      • What A Hoot

        “Yet Another Study Links Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk
        http://www.opposingviews.com/i/health/conditions/cancer/yet-another-study-links-abortion-and-breast-cancer-risk

        Fifty-one of 68 epidemiological studies since 1957 report an abortion-breast cancer (ABC) link (not counting biological and experimental evidence).

        Khachatryan’s team cited only one (severely criticized) study, Melbye et al. 1997, to support their false claim of “no effect.” [3,4,5] Although Melbye’s team found no overall increased risk, they reported a statistically significant 89% increased risk for those having abortions after 18 weeks gestation.

        National Cancer Institute Researcher Admits Abortion Breast Cancer Link
        http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2010/jan/10010706

        U.S. National Cancer Institute researcher Dr. Louise Brinton, who was the chief organizer of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshop in 2003 that persuaded women that it was “well established” that “abortion is not associated with increased breast cancer risk,” has reversed her position and now admits that abortion and oral contraceptives raise breast cancer risks.

        An April 2009 study by Jessica Dolle et al. of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center examining the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with high mortality, in women under age 45, contained an admission from Dr. Brinton and her colleagues that abortion raises breast cancer risk by 40%.”
        Yet Another Study Links Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk
        http://www.opposingviews.com
        The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer notes that an Armenian study-whose autho…See More

        Like

        • chrissythehyphenated

          It seems common-sense-obvious to me that artificially interrupting a pregnancy (abortion) or faking the body into believing it’s pregnant (birth control pills) would both be detrimental to breast health.

          As for those who loudly DENY the connection in the face of dozens and dozens of studies … I think they are just plain EVIL.

          Like

    • Pistol Pete

      I weep for all those kids who almost made it.

      Like

  2. Wait, so Trump thought that Romney was a failure at creating jobs, but now that he’s gotten to know him, he likes him? And this is a reason for a presidential endorsement???
    http://news.yahoo.com/video/politics-15749652/trump-bets-on-romney-in-las-vegas-28179652.html#crsl=%252Fvideo%252Fpolitics-15749652%252Ftrump-bets-on-romney-in-las-vegas-28179652.html

    Like

  3. The Patriot Post Digest, Friday, February 3, 2012
    ‘Doing Good to the Poor’

    Aside from [Romney’s] comments being politically tone-deaf, we have more substantive criticism. As Benjamin Franklin said, “I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it.” At best, Romney’s comments indicate that he plans to make the poor easy in their poverty by continuing, repairing and possibly extending the government “safety net.” This is not in any way conservative, and it further proves that Romney himself is not conservative, or at least as National Review’s Jonah Goldberg put it, “he speaks conservatism as a second language.”

    The conservative position — the constitutional position — is that the government has no role in providing a safety net for anyone beyond ensuring that they are safe to pursue their own prosperity under Rule of Law. Not only do redistribution schemes not work, but the Founders withheld the power for government charity because it is antithetical to Liberty.

    Like

  4. From The Case for Romney…

    In fact, it seems like the best definition of a Republican-establishment member these days is simply someone who has made peace with his disappointment prematurely.

    In this light, voting for Romney isn’t a betrayal, it’s a transaction.

    That about sums it up!

    Like

  5. Pistol Pete

    WHAT EVERY MAN WANTS FOR FATHERS DAY
    THIS PUPPY USES A 2400 GRAIN CHARGE-KINDA LIKE HAND-HELD ARTILLERY.
    OK,SO I LIKE GUNS-SO WHAT?

    Like

  6. In case you all missed it last night, Sean Hannity had each of the candidates on for an interview. It was pretty good. I can’t find a video of the whole thing, just little snippets, but I’ll keep looking. He’s doing Part 2 tonight, if you want to watch.

    One interesting thing that Gingrich noted…In the counties where voting was up from the previous election, Newt won. In the counties where voting was down, Romney won. The assumption is that the negative advertising, which was more heavily concentrated in certain areas had an impact on who won, giving Romney the advantage, but it also turned a lot of voters off, who just stayed home from the polls. We can not afford to have this come election day.

    Note: Ron Paul was not included, but that’s because he declined to participate.

    Like

    • chrissythehyphenated

      Curious what effect on voting turnout the no-doubt uber negative Obama campaign will have. In 2008, my pro-Obama niece sent around an email about how we should be voting FOR someone, not AGAINST someone. If she’s dealing with her post-Obama trauma the way I dealt with my post-Carter trauma, it would explain why I haven’t heard from her in months.

      Like

      • Well, assuming whoever the nominee is doesn’t go soft on Obama like McCain did, I’m expecting voter turnout to be low. Whatever happens, I’m sure we’ll get a hundred analyses of it!

        Like

  7. Just one more (I could not pass this one up)…
    The Right Scoop: Newt torches Romney: It isn’t good enough for the Republican party to nominate Obama-lite

    The truth is, I don’t think [Romney] understands the free market. I think he understands a lot about finance. But finance isn’t the free market. And Wall Street isn’t Main Street. And giant businesses aren’t small businesses.

    Like